The post has been changed:
Unfortunately, it is still accepted in our world that opinions on a person are, as they say, “by clothes”. Take into account his social status, status, education, the presence of connections, etc. There is no escape from this. It takes years to create your image and your reputation, which is very important for business. On the Internet, everything is a little different.
Here, to create a positive opinion of yourself, it does not take a lot of time, a maximum of several months with a skillful approach to business. And in order to "denigrate" a person, a company or a site in general, it takes several minutes. This is used by many of the dishonest competitors, what can you do, business is a tough thing, and the reputation on the Internet is changeable, like a windy lady. And once the reputation is damaged, you need to restore it, because business directly depends on it.
In Europe, companies that restore reputation on the Internet have probably existed since entrepreneurial activity “migrated” to “network spaces”. In Russia, this niche is almost empty, but it is known that "whoever has time has eaten!" A big chunk of income. Therefore, I advise you to take a closer look at this business idea - the creation or restoration of a reputation on the Internet.
Customers
Your potential customers may be:
- Celebrities of any level.
- Company executives.
- Graduates of various educational institutions dreaming of working in a prestigious company.
- All people who care about their online reputation.
Business organization
If you are a lawyer by profession - great, if not, then keep in mind that starting a business by taking a person with a legal education as a partner or staff. You can attract such a specialist from time to time, but I think that there will be so much work that it is better to hire a lawyer for a permanent job. All you need is an Internet connection, free time, and a competent PR campaign that advertises your services.
By the way, many companies do not even suspect that they have a negative reputation on the Internet, wondering why sales are not going and the flow of customers has decreased. It is to such companies that they need to offer their help, having previously monitored the company's reputation on the Internet, compiled a detailed analytical report, and offered their reputation restoration services. 
Working methods
As already mentioned - look for all the negative customer information that you can find. The faster you start acting upon discovering negative information about a client on the Internet, the more chances you can get by with "little blood", solve the emerging conflict at the initial stage, and stop its further dissemination.
You can send a person who published negative information a letter asking him to either remove his publication, or publicly apologize for the information that is not true, or give him the opportunity to “save his face” and refer to the “mistake” ... In letters and in person Meetings always communicate politely and correctly. If you do not accept your “ultimatum”, threaten to appeal to the court, here you will need a lawyer.
Contact the administration of the Internet resource on which defamatory information is posted with a request to remove unwanted content. Most often, site owners are willing to meet them. Create fake accounts, from the pages of which you will refute the negative, leave them positive feedback. Always remember that you will have to answer for any careless word.
When people in society begin to compete, who will cross out whom, it gives off devilishness. The well-known scandals so capture everyone that society is divided, some people begin to say that Volochkova was fired correctly from the theater, others say that she was wrong. But in fact, making noise out of all this is simply indecent. There is a court where you can challenge an unfair dismissal.
The task of all these disputes is not to come to the truth, it is a competition, which side of each other will tarnish more. Who loses as a result of this? All. It seems to me that this is such a way to keep people busy, to distract them from some serious problems, from working on themselves.
It is not necessary to compete in who denigrates someone more or witty names, or invents a nickname more offensively, but in the other - who better sees their shortcomings and apologizes for them. There must be love and respect for the dignity of every person, no matter who he is, whatever he is - this is a man, a creation of God.
Like, for example, a man came to get a job. “Oh, listen, and this is not the person who, remember, last year at the conference in the wardrobe, something happened with a coat? We don’t need him. ” "And why?" “I,” he says, “I don’t remember whether he either stole the coat, or stole it, but such a residue remained unpleasant, it’s better not to.”
In any conflict, we have the opportunity to influence one of the parties - ourselves. We cannot influence the other side. It must be understood that there is a limit that we cannot cross, because it is, for us, first of all, not useful. And no matter how rude and slanderous we meet on our way, this is not a reason to switch to the same vocabulary, to the same manner of presentation, to the same hysteria and emotionality. One must try to be a Christian. Seraphim of Sarov says: “Get the spirit together, and thousands of people around you will be saved.”
Slander as a tool to raise your rating
Everyone knows the Bible passage about the brothers Cain and Abel. Both offer sacrifice to God, but at Abel God accepts the sacrifice, but Cain does not. Cain has a sense of injustice, and he sees in Abel the source of his failures. And therefore, Cain has not just envy, but a desire to destroy Abel so that later, against this background, devoid of competitors, let's say, look decent.
So, often slandering psychologically arises precisely on this basis. In order for a person to look better, he begins to slander another. Why is he doing this? In our fallen world, if a person is slandering someone, lowering someone, he does it from the perspective of a more perfect, more worthy person. And so he tries to raise his rating.
I remember in my school time there was an interesting episode when one girl did not memorize Pushkin's poem. The poem is good, and Pushkin is not just a good poet, but a man of exceptional moral and spiritual feelings.
And against the background of everything that we know about Pushkin, what a wonderful poet and genius really is, this girl says to the teacher during the lesson: "But I don’t want to teach him at all." "Why?" - the teacher is surprised. “Do you know how many women he had ?!” The teacher spread her hands: “Well, I suggest you appreciate him not only for this ...” - I just could not find what to say. I later realized why this girl said so: lower the other person from the pedestal so that her dullness is perceived well.
“But I'm better than my reputation.”
Slander is a subtle passion that weaves from so many components. This is, firstly, pride and pride, the desire to exalt oneself. This, secondly, of course, is the envy of the one whom you slander. And finally, this is the hatred that ends the sin of Cain, that is, this desire for the death of a person. If not physical death, then moral death - lower the person so that he is no longer considered a person.
And so the passion that weaves from so many threads makes this sin so thorough that it sometimes lays a fatal stain on a person and creates what we call reputation. And no matter how much you say later, like Figaro in response: “You have a bad reputation,” “But I am better than my reputation,” this will not help, because often the reputation is more important than the person himself.
Of course, this must be fought from a Christian point of view. We know that reputation is nothing that a person can turn to God at the last moment. What was the reputation of a prudent robber? What is his theology, what is his life? We only know that with humility he exhorts another thief who slanders Christ: “We accept according to our deeds, but He is innocent,” that’s all. Just a few words. And this “we accept our business” turns out to be the most important thing.
See good in a man
Each passion is opposed by a certain virtue. The passion to slander a person is opposed by the ability to see good in every person. As Christ saw the good in Zacchaeus, to which no one gave a hand, and He said: "Get down soon, today I have to be with you." And it turned out that the soul of Zacchaeus immediately warmed up. And the good that Christ saw in Zacchaeus manifested itself: “I will give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I offended anyone, I will repay four times.”
Slander, of course, does not bring any healing to the soul. On the contrary, if a person deserves some criticism, then if you slander him, it will be even worse. And if there was something good in a person, it will go out, because the logic of his actions will be like this: you won’t become good for everyone, they will still speak badly of you, so why try?
We do not condemn man, but condemn sin
Of course, discussing and blaming someone is bad. And sometimes we are told that we need to be more tolerant, tolerant. If tolerance is an excuse for sin, then this concept of tolerance does not suit us at all. Yes, we are for not condemning a person, but we are not for that tolerance, which calls for justifying everything that a person does.
When we say “condemnation”, we mean that a person has a certain label attached: this is a bad person, this is an alcoholic, this is a sex maniac, this is a thief. That is, we, as it were, have spoken judgment on him. But it is not our business to talk about what kind of person he is, because "do not judge - and you will not be judged." No one wants him to stick some kind of label or condemn.
Main principle: love the sinner and hate sin. As a doctor, he hates a disease, fights it, but he does not fight his patient, but fights against his disease with him. And if we say that this or that sin is bad, we do not condemn man, we condemn sin. And when we condemned a man, we sentenced him to be like that.
These are complex, subtle things in which confusion often occurs. And it seems to me that I need to understand very clearly what condemnation is. None of us have the right to say about anyone that this is a bad, finished man whom the Lord does not love, who is deprived of salvation. None of us knows the grace of God, and what kind of people the Lord pulls out and from what dirt. He can choose people as apostles from such dirt that we never dreamed of. Or vice versa, the super-righteous may be as far from God as they themselves did not imagine.
In the Gospel, the Lord never said: “Woe to you, harlots. Woe to you, robbers. Woe to you, publicans. ” But how many times He said: "Woe to you, Pharisees." But the Pharisees are the righteous. The Lord also came to save sinners, to call sinners to repentance.
Therefore, Christianity stands on the side of the weak and perceives sin not as an incorrigible vicious trait of a person’s character or personality, but as an ailment, as a disease, implying that every person was created by God for salvation, and not for perdition.
Interviewed by Tamara Ameline
A few days ago, the movement of Russian reenactors was shocked by an article on the Exclav.ru Internet portal about the rural history teacher Pavel Korshunov.
At first glance, one can be horrified at how close the “neo-fascists” movement is next to us. However, this is for those who do not know Pavel Korshunov and do not know what military-historical reconstruction is!
To begin with, we will explain what military-historical reconstruction is for us! This is an association of enthusiastic people who love and study military history. Gathering together, we recreate the appearance of warriors of the past, study the history of events and carry out stage performances and commemorative events at the sites of past battles. We hold open lessons in schools, talk about the heroic past of Russia. We participate in various patriotic events, including the opening of museum exhibitions and monuments.
For us, this is a hobby that we take very seriously!
Pavel Korshunov got into reconstruction in 2004. As a teenager, he joined the military-historical club of the Bagrationovsky Museum of the History of the Territory. The club was then actively preparing to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Eislau in 1807. An artilleryman of the Russian Imperial Army, he took part in numerous festivals dedicated to the battles of the Napoleonic Wars: Preisish-Eylau, Pultusk, Heilsberg, Friedland, Borodino. Since 2006, Pavel in the form of a Red Army soldier participated in military-historical festivals dedicated to the anniversaries of the assault on Königsberg as part of a mortar crew and a small platoon. Pavel tried himself in the images of the defenders of the Brest Fortress, Belarusian partisans, and the Soviet marines. In 2011, Pavel played the role of “opponents”, becoming at the time of the stage re-enactment by a soldier of the German airborne troops.
After graduating from high school, Pavel entered the Faculty of History at the IKBFU Kant. He served military service in the 22nd guards separate anti-aircraft missile regiment.
Since 2014, Paul has been recreating the appearance of a soldier of the Russian Imperial Army during the First World War and participating in the military-historical festivals “The Battle of Gumbinnen in 1914”.
Working as a history teacher in high school pos. Nivenskoye, Bagrationovsky district, Pavel became the organizer of a historical and patriotic event dedicated to the feat of Soviet soldiers in the East Prussian operation of 1945. Participants in the uniform of the Red Army marched through the streets of the village, a ceremony was held at the memorial to Soviet soldiers. On the outskirts of the village was reconstructed episode of the battle.
Repeatedly Pavel was a participant in the festival “Moscow is behind us!”, Dedicated to the heroic defense of Moscow in 1941.
Continuing his development in the field of military-historical reconstruction, Pavel created a new club in which he and his comrades recreate the appearance of soldiers of the airborne troops of the countries participating in the Second World War, including German paratroopers.
In November 2016, Pavel traveled to Moscow for a gathering of leaders of historical reconstruction clubs. His participation was approved by the organizers, and the youth policy department of the Kaliningrad region took over the transportation costs. In fact, he became the representative of the reenactors of the Kaliningrad region on this Meeting.
On the Internet portal "Exclav.ru" (the founder is the head of the regional branch of the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Monuments of History and Culture MV Cherenkov) an article appeared that denigrates Pavel as a person and military-historical reconstructor. From the social page of Pavel Korshunov, the authors of the article “pulled out” the photographs, which were necessary in order to slander and defame the person. One gets the impression that our comrade became the object of revenge on the part of those who were not invited to the meeting and did not provide assistance on the trip. And this is petty and mean!
We, the signatories below, reenactors of the Kaliningrad region, declare that this article is not objective and does not reflect reality. She not only casts a shadow on Pavel Korshunov, but also on the entire reconstruction movement of the Kaliningrad region.
GVIR “Garrison”, Kaliningrad. Head: Stolyarov Sergey Nikolaevich.
GVIR "Citadel Königsberg" supervisor: Sinyukov Denis Yuryevich
VIC House of Fleet Officers. Head Andrienko Mikhail Nikolaevich
VIC "Frontier Warrior" Head: Lemesh Dmitry Vyacheslavovich
Bagrationovsky military-historical club. Leader: Panchenko Alexander Arkadevich
VIC named after Alexander Nevsky. Ozersk city. Head Tretyakov Alexander Vasilievich
VIK "Red Star" Znamensk Krek Roman Olegovich
VIK "DRK Konigsberg" leader: Golotenko Julia Vladimirovna
VIK "Parachute assault regiment", leader Khasia Dzhaniko Zurabovich
VIK "561VGD" leader: Valery Ivanovich Ermakov
VIK "Mercury" head Korshunov Pavel Vasilievich
***
From the Editor:
We add that another propaganda media that has recently acted in synchronism with Exclav.ru, the Kaliningrad editorial office of Regnum, has joined the slander of Pavel Korshunov.
The section is very easy to use. In the proposed field, just enter the desired word, and we will give you a list of its meanings. I want to note that our site provides data from various sources - encyclopedic, explanatory, derivational dictionaries. Also here you can get acquainted with examples of the use of the word you entered.
Meaning of the word denigrate
Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language, Dahl Vladimir
slander
blacken that, paint in black paint;
whom to defame, blaspheme, vilify, glorify; slander. He denigrated by this act both himself and his society, launched a bad glory. He was blackened by envy, harassing his place. Easy to tarnish, not easy to whitewash. They are suffering. and return in the meaning of speech. Blackening cf. about. valid by verb. Vilifier, -nitsa, denigrating whom.
Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. D.N. Ushakov
slander
blacken, blacken, nesov., someone. The same as blackening in 2 meanings.
New explanatory and derivational dictionary of the Russian language, T. F. Efremova.
slander
nesov. transition Present in an unseemly light; defame.
Examples of the use of the word denigrate in the literature.
The more such people convince themselves of these erroneous beliefs, the more they become natural and mired in the flesh, to the extent that they are no longer able to understand inwardly any Divine Truth, and even if they hear and accept which, denigrate her and strangle her in error.
If personal addiction makes a person decide in favor of a less worthy petitioner who has less merit, then let him do it, not blackening and without humiliating a more worthy competitor.
In particular, it instills in people idealized ideas about the Western social system and in every way denigrates communist system.